How did the government handle the details of the financial scandal?

The answer indicates that the details of the financial scandal were suppressed by the government. This suggests that rather than transparently sharing information or addressing the scandal, the government took steps to keep the details from becoming public knowledge. Suppression implies an active effort to minimize awareness or discussion around the issue, which can often occur in sensitive situations where accountability is in question or where maintaining public confidence is crucial.

In contrast, other choices reflect differing levels of transparency or acknowledgment. If the details had been made public, that would imply an open approach, facilitating public awareness. Acknowledgment would mean that the government had recognized the scandal openly, while discussing it openly would suggest a transparent conversation about the issue. These options would all indicate a different approach by the government towards the scandal than the suppression indicated in the correct answer.