What would have happened if Stevie had not acted quickly?

The correct answer indicates that if Stevie had not acted quickly, it is likely that the consequences would have been more severe, specifically relating to damage in the kitchen. This answer suggests a direct cause-and-effect relationship, asserting that prompt action prevented further consequences. In this context, choosing this option aligns with the idea that quick reactions can mitigate potential disasters, such as a fire or other forms of damage.

The other options do not convey the same sense of urgency or consequence. For instance, mentioning a fire drill implies a preventative action unrelated to the damage caused, while stating there "might have been less damage" suggests ambiguity rather than an increase in damage. The notion that "nothing significant would have happened" downplays the risk involved, failing to acknowledge the potential dangers of delaying action. Overall, the correct answer emphasizes the importance of quick responses in preventing worsening situations.